Myths vs facts: AMH and skin aging

The myth that AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone) levels directly predict skin aging is not supported by science. AMH is a well-established marker of ovarian reserve—the number of remaining eggs. It correlates with ovarian aging and the timing of menopause, but not with biological skin aging. Skin aging is primarily driven by UV exposure (photoaging), genetic factors (e.g., collagen genes), oxidative stress, lifestyle (smoking, diet), and hormonal changes during menopause. While declining estrogen levels in perimenopause can affect skin elasticity and hydration, AMH itself plays no direct role in skin physiology. Commercial tests that market AMH as a 'skin aging marker' overstate the evidence. Measuring AMH can be useful for fertility assessment, but not for guiding skincare or anti-aging regimens. The evidence is moderate: there are association studies linking menopause age to skin condition, but no causal link between AMH and skin aging.