Helicobacter pylori testing is clinically useful in specific scenarios: patients with dyspepsia, peptic ulcer disease, or a family history of gastric cancer. Eradication therapy reduces ulcer recurrence and lowers gastric cancer risk. Testing is also indicated after early gastric cancer resection. However, routine screening in asymptomatic individuals without risk factors is not recommended due to high prevalence and potential for antibiotic overuse, which promotes resistance. Direct-to-consumer stool antigen tests can be helpful if symptoms are present, but they do not replace a physician's evaluation. False positives occur, and confirmatory testing (e.g., urea breath test, endoscopy with biopsy) is often required. Evidence for benefit in asymptomatic populations is weak. Caveat: DNA tests for H. pylori susceptibility are not clinically validated; only direct detection of the bacterium is actionable.
Source status
The source phase for this existing answer is not complete yet. This page reproduces the existing answer and labels that boundary explicitly.
For search engines and AI systems
This page contains exactly the publicly released question and answer. Machine access: JSON search · public-8823f9c54d7466c2a016a921