Evidence check: Nährstoffcheck in the context of Langlebigkeit

The question of a 'nutrient check' in the context of longevity is valid, but the evidence is nuanced. Some biomarkers like vitamin D, omega-3 index, homocysteine, or magnesium show associations with healthy aging in observational studies. However, for most direct-to-consumer nutrient tests, randomized controlled trials proving a causal benefit for lifespan extension are lacking. Genetic tests (e.g., FADS1 for omega-3 conversion) provide mechanistic hints, but effect sizes are small and often not directly actionable. A blood test measuring actual nutrient levels is usually more informative than a DNA-only check. Moreover, high doses of certain nutrients (e.g., vitamin A, selenium) can be harmful. For an evidence-based longevity strategy, I recommend focusing on established biomarkers (vitamin D, B12, omega-3), individual risk factors (e.g., FTO for obesity), and above all lifestyle factors (diet, exercise, sleep). A blanket nutrient check without medical interpretation is often marketing. Evidence: mixed – mechanistic/observational, but no strong longevity evidence from RCTs.