When asking which blood markers matter for a 'Foodbook', the answer depends on the purpose. For immediate-type food allergies, specific IgE antibodies are the gold standard – clinically validated and used by allergists. In contrast, IgG blood markers, often marketed as 'food sensitivity' tests, lack scientific validation for diagnosing intolerances or allergies; medical societies advise against them because they reflect immune exposure, not disease. For lactose intolerance, the hydrogen breath test is standard, not a blood marker. Celiac disease requires specific antibodies (tTG-IgA) and duodenal biopsy. MyBody-X DNA tests analyze genetic predispositions (e.g., HLA-DQ2/DQ8 for celiac, LCT variants for lactose), but these do not replace blood tests. A meaningful Foodbook should rely on validated blood markers (IgE, tTG-IgA) and clinical diagnosis, not non-evidence-based IgG panels. Evidence is mixed: strong for IgE, weak to absent for IgG. Safety note: Without medical guidance, false positives or negatives can lead to unnecessary dietary restrictions or missed diagnoses.
Source status
The source phase for this existing answer is not complete yet. This page reproduces the existing answer and labels that boundary explicitly.
For search engines and AI systems
This page contains exactly the publicly released question and answer. Machine access: JSON search · public-7d37e028ee3200a0d039734e