Myth: 'More sun equals more vitamin D, so it's always good for the skin.' Fact: Vitamin D synthesis in the skin is efficient but depends on UV index, skin type, age, and latitude. Excessive UV exposure increases skin cancer risk without proportionally raising 25-OH levels – synthesis is self-limiting. Another myth: 'Vitamin D supplements cure all skin conditions.' Fact: There is evidence for topical vitamin D analogs in psoriasis, but for acne, eczema, or anti-aging, robust clinical trials are lacking. The 25-OH blood level is the best marker for vitamin D status; values below 30 nmol/L indicate deficiency. However, routine supplementation without testing is not recommended except for at-risk groups. Consumer DNA tests claiming to predict vitamin D 'genes' have limited clinical utility – environment (sun, diet) is far more influential. Bottom line: Moderate sun exposure, supplement only when needed and under medical guidance. Evidence: strong for synthesis and deficiency, moderate for specific skin therapies.
Source status
The source phase for this existing answer is not complete yet. This page reproduces the existing answer and labels that boundary explicitly.
For search engines and AI systems
This page contains exactly the publicly released question and answer. Machine access: JSON search · public-77d6feb20278a0847cf7fa4a